Wednesday, May 23, 2012
HP & the mathematics of mass firing
How much do corporate layoffs cost the government via unemployment?
Its hard to give a total sum but we can get a gist by using examples, and what better example to use than from this afternoon:
"Hewlett Packard Co plans to lay off roughly 27,000 employees or about 8 percent of its workforce over the next couple of years to jumpstart growth and save up to $3.5 billion annually, sending its shares 11% higher" - Reuters
So HP will save $3.5 billion annually and stockholders thought that ridding it self of 27,000 employees was such a super idea, that its shares spiked meaning larger dividends.
Everyone's happy. Well, except for those fired but they don't count.. they're not shareholders... Right Hewlett Packard?
Let's say for simplicity sake, every person fired is to receive $300/wk...
That's 27,000 x $300 = $8.1 million spent for one week.
Now let's say as of week 27, 33% of the 27,000 suddenly became gainfully employed, that means the for the first 26 weeks prior, the government covered all those fired...
27,000 former HP employees x $300 x 26 wks = $210.6 million.
OK, with us so far?
Let's suppose by week 53, another 9,000 workers (33%) magically found jobs, that means for weeks 27-52, the government spent...
18,000 former HP employees x $300 x 26 wks = $140.4 million.
9,000 former HP employees x $300 x 26 wks = $70.2 million.
Finally... we add those 3 big numbers together to see how much money in unemployment the government spent to cover 27,000 former HP workers who would still have jobs if not for the need for HP to maximize profits and shareholders to be happy:
$210.6m + $140.4m + $70.2m = $421.2 million dollars.
Because our example is real and HP is going to lay these people off, the government will have to spend $421.2 million dollars in a 79 week period once the mass layoffs begin, which is in essence, to cover human resource losses of an inept, incompetent company that can't seem to generate profit by any creative means outside of firing workers.